
When I went to photography school in the mid 1980s, it was made quite clear to us - as aspiring photojournalists - that the future of photojournalism was dead.
Quite simply the still photographic image was losing the race for public media attention to a sexier, faster, wealthier medium… television.
Then along came digital photography. Suddenly the still image was back in the game. and after a few false starts, photojournalism regained speed, and sex appeal… perhaps not wealth, but two out of three wasn’t bad for a medium that was pronounced dead, or at least given very little time to live only a few years previous.
The first real - as in practical - digital SLR came upon the stage in the mid-90s. Kodak brought it to market and made bold claims about the future of photography. I recall a sales rep managing to keep a straight face as he handed one to me and announced that this was the future and at a price tag of just $43K.
It was crap. The image quality from that camera I mean, but economics drove technology forward and DSLRs evolved into workable and somewhat affordable pieces of equipment that rescued photojournalism from its dire fate.
Then along came the iPhone.
Packing a built-in camera that was already leagues better then the early DSLRs, the iPhone shoots stills or video and best of all it can upload immediately and directly to media websites. Spot news is now recorded and reported by the participants or the by stander. The distribution mechanism remains.
As we stare down the barrel of 2012, the media industry has witnessed and weathered nearly three years of deep financial cuts, losses, closures, layoffs and general dismay, with newspapers and photojournalists feeling the bite most severely. This week, as CNN lays off yet more people, I hear the rumblings once again… “photojournalism” is dying, dead, or at best gasping for breath.
Is that true? I don’t know. Maybe.
No question that the field is shifting dramatically, opportunities close, new ones open and the new vernacular is “Citizen Journalism”.
News media for the people, by the people, or something like that.
When I enrolled in photography school I did so because I was set on becoming a photojournalist. I was crushed by the news that my chosen career was dead before I even got a real taste of it.
Some years down the line, after graduating, and after shedding the commercial skin that my jaded education had grown over my photographic heart, I sat in an editor’s office waiting as he reviewed a series of pictures. Photographs made on a remote, rugged and beautiful stretch of New Zealand coastline. Photographs that documented a group of Maori removing the jawbones from a stranded and dead sperm whale. Photographs that tapped into the heart of the matter, a story about cultural identity, personal revival, traditional practice, and cultural renaissance.
As he reviewed my images, I waited expectantly for his comments. I’m quite sure that I expected to hear praise. He looked up from the table of prints, levelled his gaze on me and said, “you’re an artist, not a journalist”.
I was deeply offended.
I saw myself as a journalist, a photojournalist; not an artist.
It took a few more years for me to know myself well enough to know that not only was he right, it was in fact a compliment. I am not a journalist. I have artist in my blood.
So let the iPhone packing citizens have their journalism and make it too.
It’s the art that I want.
The art of visual documentary storytelling.
The art of deeper exploration, richer contemplation, and personal discovery.
QG
PS - Yes, the magazine did publish my story, and they completely buggered up the layout; artistically speaking.